Comparison of shape regression methods under landmark position uncertainty

  • Authors:
  • Nora Baka;Coert Metz;Michiel Schaap;Boudewijn Lelieveldt;Wiro Niessen;Marleen de Bruijne

  • Affiliations:
  • Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands;Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands and Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands;Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands and Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands;Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands and University of Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Venue:
  • MICCAI'11 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention - Volume Part II
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in regression based shape estimation, no study has yet systematically compared different regression methods for shape estimation. We aimed to fill this gap by comparing linear regression methods with a special focus on shapes with landmark position uncertainties. We investigate two scenarios: In the first, the uncertainty of the landmark positions was similar in the training and test dataset, whereas in the second the uncertainty of the training and test data were different. Both scenarios were tested on simulated data and on statistical models of the left ventricle estimating the end-systolic shape from end-diastole with landmark uncertainties derived from the segmentation process, and of the femur estimating the 3D shape from one projection with landmark uncertainties derived from the imaging setup. Results show that in the first scenario linear regression methods tend to perform similar. In the second scenario including estimates of the test shape landmark uncertainty in the regression improved results.