Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks
Journal of Automated Reasoning
Modeling Dialogues Using Argumentation
ICMAS '00 Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS-2000)
Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: attack refinement and the grounded extension
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
Extracting the Core of a Persuasion Dialog to Evaluate Its Quality
ECSQARU '09 Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension
ECSQARU '09 Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
A characterisation of strategy-proofness for grounded argumentation semantics
IJCAI'09 Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence
Expanding Argumentation Frameworks: Enforcing and Monotonicity Results
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Argument Theory Change Through Defeater Activation
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Dynamic of argumentation frameworks
IJCAI'13 Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This article studies a specific kind of change in an argumentation system: the removal of an argument and its interactions. We illustrate this operation in a legal context and we establish the conditions to obtain some desirable properties when removing an argument.