Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data
Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data
A Quantitative Analysis of Preclusivity vs. Similarity Based Rough Approximations
TSCTC '02 Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing
Near Sets. Special Theory about Nearness of Objects
Fundamenta Informaticae - New Frontiers in Scientific Discovery - Commemorating the Life and Work of Zdzislaw Pawlak
Approximation Spaces Based on Relations of Similarity and Dissimilarity of Objects
Fundamenta Informaticae - Special Issue on Concurrency Specification and Programming (CS&P)
Nearness of Objects: Extension of Approximation Space Model
Fundamenta Informaticae - Special Issue on Concurrency Specification and Programming (CS&P)
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Transactions on Rough Sets XVI
Soft Nearness Approximation Spaces
Fundamenta Informaticae - Cognitive Informatics and Computational Intelligence: Theory and Applications
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The theory of near sets and the theory of rough sets share a common metric root. Since a probe function and an equivalence relation can be regarded as a pseudometric on U, in actual fact the underlying structure of both theories is a family of pseudometrics. The same starting point one can find in metric topology (e.g. [2]): an arbitrary family of pseudometrics is called a pregauge structure and when this family additionally separates all points, it is called a gauge structure. Pregauge structures characterise all completely regular spaces, whereas gauge structures correspond to all Hausdorff completely regular spaces (often called gauge spaces). In consequence, a perceptual system and an information system can be regarded as both pregauge structures and as topological completely regular spaces. In the paper, we would like to make a step towards gauge structures. A perceptual system or an approximation space does usually not separate all points, therefore we introduce the concept of a completion of a pregauge, but on the relational level: that is, a pregauge is regarded as a family E of equivalence relations, and a completion of ε is a relation R which added to ε, makes this family separate all points of U. If R is an equivalence relation, then ε ∪ R can be converted into a gauge structure and the corresponding topology will be Hausdorff completely regular. Since, in data analysis, U is finite, this topology will be discrete. Therefore, our aim is actually to find weaker topologies than gauge spaces. To this end, we allow R to be a tolerance relation and we consider topologies on the pregauge structure and on its completion, separately. At the end we present a simple application of these topologies.