Dialectic semantics for argumentation frameworks
ICAIL '99 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Credulous and Sceptical Argument Games for Preferred Semantics
JELIA '00 Proceedings of the European Workshop on Logics in Artificial Intelligence
Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
Journal of Logic and Computation
Arguments from Experience: The PADUA Protocol
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
On the outcomes of multiparty persuasion
The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1
Multi-party argument from experience
ArgMAS'09 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper concerns a distributed argumentation system where different agents are equipped with argumentative knowledge base (henceforth referred as KB) within which conflict arguments are represented using attacking relations. This paper proposes the notion of "defensibility" of an argument in a distributed argumentation system and a multi-party dialogue game to compute the defensibility of an argument. In our approach, we have proposed the notion of critical factor, legal move function and critical countermeasure, for avoiding idle attack and invalid attack in the course of dialogues. It is anticipated that this research will contribute to argumentation research in MAS.