Evaluation of Traditional, Orthogonal, and Radial Tree Diagrams by an Eye Tracking Study

Authors:
Michael Burch;Natalia Konevtsova;Julian Heinrich;Markus Hoeferlin;Daniel Weiskopf
Affiliations:
VISUS, University of Stuttgart;VISUS, University of Stuttgart;VISUS, University of Stuttgart;VISUS, University of Stuttgart;VISUS, University of Stuttgart
Venue:
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Year:
2011

Citing 0
Cited 4

Enriching indented pixel tree plots with node-oriented quantitative, categorical, relational, and time-series data

Diagrams'12 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Diagrammatic Representation and Inference
The aesthetics of rapidly-exploring random trees

Proceedings of the Symposium on Computational Aesthetics
ISeeCube: visual analysis of gaze data for video

Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
AOI rivers for visualizing dynamic eye gaze frequencies

EuroVis '13 Proceedings of the 15th Eurographics Conference on Visualization

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Node-link diagrams are an effective and popular visualization approach for depicting hierarchical structures and for showing parent-child relationships. In this paper, we present the results of an eye tracking experiment investigating traditional, orthogonal, and radial node-link tree layouts as a piece of empirical basis for choosing between those layouts. Eye tracking was used to identify visual exploration behaviors of participants that were asked to solve a typical hierarchy exploration task by inspecting a static tree diagram: finding the least common ancestor of a given set of marked leaf nodes. To uncover exploration strategies, we examined fixation points, duration, and saccades of participants' gaze trajectories. For the non-radial diagrams, we additionally investigated the effect of diagram orientation by switching the position of the root node to each of the four main orientations. We also recorded and analyzed correctness of answers as well as completion times in addition to the eye movement data. We found out that traditional and orthogonal tree layouts significantly outperform radial tree layouts for the given task. Furthermore, by applying trajectory analysis techniques we uncovered that participants cross-checked their task solution more often in the radial than in the non-radial layouts.