Improving SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) subject classification through reference analysis

Authors:
Antonio J. Gómez-Núñez;Benjamín Vargas-Quesada;Félix Moya-Anegón;Wolfgang Glänzel
Affiliations:
CSIC, SCImago Research Group Associated Unit, Granada, Spain and CSIC --- Institute of Public Goods and Policies (IPP), Madrid, Spain;CSIC, SCImago Research Group Associated Unit, Granada, Spain and Faculty of Communication and Information Science, University of Granada, Granada, Spain;CSIC, SCImago Research Group Associated Unit, Granada, Spain and CSIC --- Institute of Public Goods and Policies (IPP), Madrid, Spain;Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM) and Dept. MSI, K.U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Venue:
Scientometrics
Year:
2011

Citing 3
Cited 1

Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Classification of scientific networks using aggregated journal-journal citation relations in the Journal Citation Reports

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

LIS journals scientific impact and subject categorization: a comparison between Web of Science and Scopus

Scientometrics

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In order to re-categorize the SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) journals based on Scopus, as well as improve the SJR subject classification scheme, an iterative process built upon reference analysis of citing journals was designed. The first step entailed construction of a matrix containing citing journals and cited categories obtained through the aggregation of cited journals. Assuming that the most representative categories in each journal would be represented by the highest citation values regarding categories, the matrix vectors were reduced using a threshold to discern and discard the weakest relations. The process was refined on the basis of different parameters of a heuristic nature, including (1) the development of several tests applying different thresholds, (2) the designation of a cutoff, (3) the number of iterations to execute, and (4) a manual review operation of a certain amount of multi-categorized journals. Despite certain shortcomings related with journal classification, the method showed a solid performance in grouping journals at a level higher than categories--that is, aggregating journals into subject areas. It also enabled us to redesign the SJR classification scheme, providing for a more cohesive one that covers a good proportion of re-categorized journals.