ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies: NIMSAD, a Systematic Framework
Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies: NIMSAD, a Systematic Framework
Evaluation of Information Modeling Methods -- A Review
HICSS '98 Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-Volume 5 - Volume 5
Toward autonomic web services trust and selection
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Service oriented computing
SOAF: An Architectural Framework for Service Definition and Realization
SCC '06 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Services Computing
A Framework for Roles for Development, Evolution and Maintenance of SOA-Based Systems
SDSOA '07 Proceedings of the International Workshop on Systems Development in SOA Environments
A stakeholder-driven service life cycle model for SOA
2nd international workshop on Service oriented software engineering: in conjunction with the 6th ESEC/FSE joint meeting
Service-oriented design and development methodology
International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology
SOMA: a method for developing service-oriented solutions
IBM Systems Journal
An Overview of Software Engineering Approaches to Service Oriented Architectures in Various Fields
WETICE '09 Proceedings of the 2009 18th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructures for Collaborative Enterprises
Criteria-Based Evaluation Framework for Service-Oriented Methodologies
UKSIM '10 Proceedings of the 2010 12th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation
A methodology for web services-based SOA realisation
International Journal of Business Information Systems
A pragmatic approach for analysis and design of service inventories
ICSOC'11 Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on Service-Oriented Computing
Towards of service-oriented design architecture method
Proceedings of the 2013 Research in Adaptive and Convergent Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Service-oriented computing is a paradigm for effectively delivering software services in a dynamic environment. Accordingly, many service-oriented software engineering (SOSE) methodologies have been proposed and practiced in both academia and industry. Some of these methodologies share common features (e.g. cover similar life-cycle phases) but are presented for different purposes, ranging from project management to system modernization, and from business analysis to technical solutions development. Given this diversity in the methodologies available in the literature, it is very hard for a company to decide which methodology would fit best for its specific needs. With this aim, we took a feature analysis approach and devised a framework for comparing the existing SOA methodologies. Different from existing comparison frameworks, ours specifically highlights aspects that are specific to SOA and aims to differentiate the methodologies that are truly service-oriented from those that deal little with service aspects. As such, the criteria defined in the framework can be used as a checklist for selecting a SOSE methodology.