Welldefined decision scenarios

  • Authors:
  • Thomas D. Nielsen;Finn V. Jensen

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg Øst, Denmark;Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg Øst, Denmark

  • Venue:
  • UAI'99 Proceedings of the Fifteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
  • Year:
  • 1999

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Influence diagrams serve as a powerful tool for modelling symmetric decision problems. When solving an influence diagram we determine a set of strategies for the decisions involved. A strategy for a decision variable is in principle a function over its past. However, some of the past may be irrelevant for the decision, and for computational reasons it is important not to deal with redundant variables in the strategies. We show that current methods (e.g. the Decision Bayes-ball algorithm [Shachter, 1998]) do not determine the relevant past, and we present a complete algorithm. Actually, this paper takes a more general outset: When formulating a decision scenario as an influence diagram, a linear temporal ordering of the decisions variables is required. This constraint ensures that the decision scenario is welldefined. However, the structure of a decision scenario often yields certain decisions conditionally independent, and it is therefore unnecessary to impose a linear temporal ordering on the decisions. In this paper we deal with partial influence diagrams i.e. influence diagrams with only a partial temporal ordering specified. We present a set of conditions which are necessary and sufficient to ensure that a partial influence diagram is welldefined. These conditions are used as a basis for the construction of an algorithm for determining whether or not a partial influence diagram is welldefined.