How our beliefs contribute to interpret actions

Authors:
Guillaume Aucher
Affiliations:
University of Otago (NZ) – University Paul Sabatier (F)
Venue:
CEEMAS'05 Proceedings of the 4th international Central and Eastern European conference on Multi-Agent Systems and Applications
Year:
2005

Citing 6
Cited 1

Reasoning about knowledge and probability

Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Belief revision

Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (Vol. 4)
Knowlege in action: logical foundations for specifying and implementing dynamical systems

Knowlege in action: logical foundations for specifying and implementing dynamical systems
Probabilistic Dynamic Epistemic Logic

Journal of Logic, Language and Information
Conditional Probability Meets Update Logic

Journal of Logic, Language and Information
A combined system for update logic and belief revision

PRIMA'04 Proceedings of the 7th Pacific Rim international conference on Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

Diversity of Agents and Their Interaction

Journal of Logic, Language and Information

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In update logic the interpretation of an action is often assumed to be independent from the agents' beliefs about the situation (see [BMS04] or [Auc05]). In this paper we deal with this type of phenomenon. We also deal with actions that change facts of the situation. We use probability to model the notion of belief and our probabilistic update mechanism satisfies the AGM postulates of belief revision.