Analysis of object oriented spatial access methods
SIGMOD '87 Proceedings of the 1987 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
Towards an analysis of range query performance in spatial data structures
PODS '93 Proceedings of the twelfth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems
CIKM '93 Proceedings of the second international conference on Information and knowledge management
Beyond uniformity and independence: analysis of R-trees using the concept of fractal dimension
PODS '94 Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems
A model for the prediction of R-tree performance
PODS '96 Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems
SAC '98 Proceedings of the 1998 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
Cost models for overlapping and multiversion structures
ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS)
Access path selection in a relational database management system
SIGMOD '79 Proceedings of the 1979 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
Designing Access Methods for Bitemporal Databases
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
The R+-Tree: A Dynamic Index for Multi-Dimensional Objects
VLDB '87 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases
MV3R-Tree: A Spatio-Temporal Access Method for Timestamp and Interval Queries
Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases
Adaptive cell-based index for moving objects
Data & Knowledge Engineering
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we describe a cost model for an adaptive cell-based index structure which aims at efficient management of immense amounts of spatio-temporal data. We first survey various methods to estimate the performance of R-tree variants. Then, we present our cost model which accurately estimates the number of disk accesses for the adaptive cell-based index structure. To show the accuracy of our model, we perform a detailed analysis using various data sets. The experimental result shows that our model has the average error ratio from 7% to 13%.