Multiple Objective Optimization with Vector Evaluated Genetic Algorithms
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms
The Pareto Envelope-Based Selection Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimisation
PPSN VI Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature
Constrained Test Problems for Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimization
EMO '01 Proceedings of the First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization
Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a historical view of the field
IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case studyand the strength Pareto approach
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Stochastic ranking for constrained evolutionary optimization
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Using unconstrained elite archives for multiobjective optimization
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Rank-density-based multiobjective genetic algorithm and benchmark test function study
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Intelligent evolutionary algorithms for large parameter optimization problems
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
A Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimizer for Constrained Optimization
International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research
Hi-index | 0.00 |
To handle the constrained multi-objective evolutionary optimization problems, the authors firstly analyze Deb's constrained-domination principle (DCDP) and point out that it more likely stick into local optimum on these problems with two or more disconnected feasible regions. Secondly, to handle constraints in multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs), a new constraint handling strategy is proposed, which keeps infeasible elitists to act as bridges connecting disconnected feasible regions besides feasible ones during optimization and adopts stochastic ranking to balance objectives and constraints in each generation. Finally, this strategy is applied to NSGA-II, and then is compared with DCDP on six benchmark constrained MOPs. Our results demonstrate that distribution and stability of the solutions are distinctly improved on the problems with two or more disconnected feasible regions, such as CTP6.