C-arm calibration – is it really necessary?

  • Authors:
  • Ameet Jain;Ryan Kon;Yu Zhou;Gabor Fichtinger

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University;Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University;Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University;Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University

  • Venue:
  • MICCAI'05 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - Volume Part I
  • Year:
  • 2005

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

C-arm fluoroscopy is modelled as a perspective projection, the parameters of which are estimated through a calibration procedure. It has been universally accepted that precise intra-procedural calibration is a prerequisite for accurate quantitative C-arm fluoroscopy guidance. Calibration, however, significantly adds to system complexity, which is a major impediment to clinical practice. We challenge the status quo by questioning the assumption that precise intra-procedural calibration is really necessary. We derived theoretical bounds for the sensitivity of 3D measurements to mis-calibration. Experimental results corroborated the theory in that mis-calibration in the focal spot by as much as 50 mm still allows for tracking with an accuracy of 0.5 mm in translation and 0.65o in rotation, and such mis-calibration does not impose any additional error on the reconstruction of small objects.