A method for integrating utility analysis into an expert system for design evaluation under uncertainty

Authors:
Deborah L. Thurston;Yun Qi Tian
Affiliations:
Decision Systems Laboratory, Department of General Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL;Decision Systems Laboratory, Department of General Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Venue:
UAI'91 Proceedings of the Seventh conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
Year:
1991

Citing 4
Cited 0

A note on PERT times

Management Science
Value-driven expert systems for decision support

Expert judgment and expert systems
A comparison of decision alaysis and expert rules for sequential diagnosis

UAI '88 Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
An experimental comparison of knowledge engineering for expert systems and for decision analysis

AAAI'87 Proceedings of the sixth National conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

In mechanical design, there is often unavoidable uncertainty in estimates of design performance. Evaluation of design alternatives requires consideration of the impact of this uncertainty. Expert heuristics embody assumptions regarding the designer's attitude towards risk and uncertainty that might be reasonable in most cases but inaccurate in others. We present a technique to allow designers to incorporate their own unique attitude towards uncertainty as opposed to those assumed by the domain expert's rules. The general approach is to eliminate aspects of heuristic rules which directly or indirectly include assumptions regarding the user's attitude towards risk, and replace them with explicit, user-specified probabilistic multiattribute utility and probability distribution functions. We illustrate the method in a system for material selection for automobile bumpers.