A comparison of evolutionary methods for the discovery of local search heuristics

  • Authors:
  • Stuart Bain;John Thornton;Abdul Sattar

  • Affiliations:
  • Institute for Integrated and Intelligent Systems, Griffith University, Australia;Institute for Integrated and Intelligent Systems, Griffith University, Australia;Institute for Integrated and Intelligent Systems, Griffith University, Australia

  • Venue:
  • AI'05 Proceedings of the 18th Australian Joint conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
  • Year:
  • 2005

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Methods of adaptive constraint satisfaction have recently become of interest to overcome the limitations imposed on “black-box” search algorithms by the no free lunch theorems. Two methods that each use an evolutionary algorithm to adapt to particular classes of problem are the CLASS system of Fukunaga and the evolutionary constraint algorithm work of Bain et al. We directly compare these methods, demonstrating that although special purpose methods can learn excellent algorithms, on average standard evolutionary operators perform even better, and are less susceptible to the problems of bloat and redundancy.