Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS)
Reasoning about systems with many processes
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Theoretical Computer Science
Symbolic model checking with rich assertional languages
Theoretical Computer Science
Model checking of systems with many identical timed processes
Theoretical Computer Science
Reachability Analysis of Pushdown Automata: Application to Model-Checking
CONCUR '97 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Concurrency Theory
Specification and verification of concurrent systems in CESAR
Proceedings of the 5th Colloquium on International Symposium on Programming
Extrapolating Tree Transformations
CAV '02 Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification
Verification of an Audio Protocol with Bus Collision Using UPPAAL
CAV '96 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification
Putting Time into Proof Outlines
Proceedings of the Real-Time: Theory in Practice, REX Workshop
LICS '04 Proceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
Simulation-Based iteration of tree transducers
TACAS'05 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
One of the prominent methods for program verification is that of model checking [CES86,QS82]. In the last decade there has been an extensive research effort in order to extend the applicability of model checking to systems with infinite state spaces. There are at least two reasons why a system may be infinite-state: – A system may operate on data structures with unbounded domains. Examples include real-valued clocks in timed automata [AD94], stacks in push-down automata [BEM97], queues in communicating processes [AJ96], counters in counter machines, etc. – A system can also be infinite-state because it is parameterized. This means that the description of the system is parameterized by the number of components inside the system. In such a case, we would like to verify correctness of the system regardless of the number of processes. We consider systems which contain both sources of infiniteness; namely parameterized systems of processes each of which behaves as a timed automaton.