Overview of the first TREC conference
SIGIR '93 Proceedings of the 16th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
How reliable are the results of large-scale information retrieval experiments?
Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
The Philosophy of Information Retrieval Evaluation
CLEF '01 Revised Papers from the Second Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum on Evaluation of Cross-Language Information Retrieval Systems
Providing consistent and exhaustive relevance assessments for XML retrieval evaluation
Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
Narrowed extended XPath i (NEXI)
INEX'04 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval
INEX'04 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval
INEX'04 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval
The interactive track at INEX 2004
INEX'04 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval
Report on the ad-hoc track of the INEX 2005 workshop
ACM SIGIR Forum
Articulating information needs in XML query languages
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
XML search: languages, INEX and scoring
ACM SIGMOD Record
Ranking for Approximated XQuery Full-Text Queries
BNCOD '08 Proceedings of the 25th British national conference on Databases: Sharing Data, Information and Knowledge
INEX'05 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval
B3-SDR and effective use of structural hints
INEX'05 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval
RMIT university at INEX 2005: ad hoc track
INEX'05 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval
An approach to define flexible structural constraints in XQuery
AMT'12 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Active Media Technology
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
There has been much debate over how to interpret the structure in queries that contain structural hints. At INEX 2003 and 2004, there were two interpretations: SCAS in which the user specified target element was interpreted strictly, and VCAS in which it was interpreted vaguely. But how many ways are there that the query could be interpreted? In the investigation at INEX 2005 (discussed herein) four different interpretations were proposed, and compared on the same queries. Those interpretations (SSCAS, SVCAS, VSCAS, and VVCAS) are the four interpretations possible by interpreting the target elements, and the support elements, either strictly or vaguely. An analysis of the submitted runs shows that those that share an interpretation of the target element correlate – that is, the previous decision to divide CAS into the SCAS and VCAS (as done at INEX 2003 and 2004) was sound. The analysis is supported by the fact that the best performing VSCAS run was submitted to the VVCAS task and the best performing SVCAS run was submitted to the SSCAS task.