Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks
Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems
Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks
Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems
TOSSIM: accurate and scalable simulation of entire TinyOS applications
Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems
Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services
Energy-efficient forwarding strategies for geographic routing in lossy wireless sensor networks
SenSys '04 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems
The emergence of networking abstractions and techniques in TinyOS
NSDI'04 Proceedings of the 1st conference on Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation - Volume 1
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Recent studies in wireless sensor networks (WSN) have observed that the irregular link quality is a common phenomenon, rather than an anomaly. The irregular link quality, especially link asymmetry, has significant impacts on the design of WSN protocols. In this paper, we propose two asymmetry-aware link quality services: the neighborhood link quality service (NLQS) and the link relay service (LRS). The novelty of the NLQS service is taking the link asymmetry into consideration to provide timeliness link quality and distinguishing the inbound and outbound neighbors with the support of LRS, which builds a relay framework to alleviate the effects of link asymmetry. To demonstrate the proposed link quality services, we design and implement two example applications, the shortest hops routing tree (SHRT) and the best path reliability routing tree (BRRT), on the TinyOS platform. We found that the performance of two example applications is improved substantially. More than 40% of nodes identify more outbound neighbors and the percentage of increased outbound neighbors is between 14% and 100%. In SHRT, more than 15% of nodes reduce hops of the routing tree and the percentage of reduced hops is between 14% and 100%. In BRRT, more than 16% of nodes improve the path reliability of the routing tree and the percentage of the improved path reliability is between 2% to 50%.