Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection
Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection
C4.5: programs for machine learning
C4.5: programs for machine learning
Speech Sound Discrimination with Genetic Programming
EuroGP '98 Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Genetic Programming
Acoustic characteristics of lexical stress in continuous speech
ICASSP '97 Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '97)-Volume 3 - Volume 3
Detecting stress in spoken English using Decision Trees and Support Vector Machines
ACSW Frontiers '04 Proceedings of the second workshop on Australasian information security, Data Mining and Web Intelligence, and Software Internationalisation - Volume 32
Learning models for English speech recognition
ACSC '04 Proceedings of the 27th Australasian conference on Computer science - Volume 26
Feature Selection for Unsupervised Learning
The Journal of Machine Learning Research
Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference: Late Breaking Papers
Open issues in genetic programming
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper describes an approach to the use of genetic programming (GP) for the automatic detection of rhythmic stress in spoken New Zealand English. A linear-structured GP system uses speaker independent prosodic features and vowel quality features as terminals to classify each vowel segment as stressed or unstressed. Error rate is used as the fitness function. In addition to the standard four arithmetic operators, this approach also uses several other arithmetic, trigonometric, and conditional functions in the function set. The approach is evaluated on 60 female adult utterances with 703 vowels and a maximum accuracy of 92.61% is achieved. The approach is compared with decision trees (DT) and support vector machines (SVM). The results suggest that, on our data set, GP outperforms DT and SVM for stress detection, and GP has stronger automatic feature selection capability than DT and SVM.