Practical strategic reasoning and adaptation in rational argument-based negotiation

  • Authors:
  • Michael Rovatsos;Iyad Rahwan;Felix Fischer;Gerhard Weiss

  • Affiliations:
  • School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK;Institute of Informatics, The British University in Dubai, Dubai, UAE;Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany;Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany

  • Venue:
  • ArgMAS'05 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
  • Year:
  • 2005

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Recent years have seen an increasing interest of multiagent system research in employing the theory of argumentation for the development of communication protocols. While significant progress has been made in formalising argument-based communication, (possibly adaptive) agent-level argumentation strategies as a practical integration of rational agent reasoning and inter-agent argumentation dialogues have received fairly little attention. In this paper we propose the use of the InFFrA framework in argument-based negotiation. This framework allows for a strategic and adaptive communication to achieve private goals within the limits of bounded rationality in open argumentation communities. The feasibility of the approach is illustrated in an agent-based web linkage scenario, showing that its performance is comparable to that of simple proposal-based negotiation while accommodating much stricter constraints regarding “what can be said” like those used in argumentation.