On quadratic threshold CSPs

  • Authors:
  • Per Austrin;Siavosh Benabbas;Avner Magen

  • Affiliations:
  • Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University;Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto;Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto

  • Venue:
  • LATIN'10 Proceedings of the 9th Latin American conference on Theoretical Informatics
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

A predicate P:{– 1, 1}k→{0,1} can be associated with a constraint satisfaction problem $\textsc{Max CSP}{(P)}$. P is called “approximation resistant” if $\textsc{Max CSP}{(P)}$ cannot be approximated better than the approximation obtained by choosing a random assignment, and “approximable” otherwise. This classification of predicates has proved to be an important and challenging open problem. Motivated by a recent result of Austrin and Mossel (Computational Complexity, 2009), we consider a natural subclass of predicates defined by signs of quadratic polynomials, including the special case of predicates defined by signs of linear forms, and supply algorithms to approximate them as follows. In the quadratic case we prove that every symmetric predicate is approximable. We introduce a new rounding algorithm for the standard semidefinite programming relaxation of $\textsc{Max CSP}{(P)}$ for any predicate P:{– 1, 1}k→{0,1} and analyze its approximation ratio. Our rounding scheme operates by first manipulating the optimal SDP solution so that all the vectors are nearly perpendicular and then applying a form of hyperplane rounding to obtain an integral solution. The advantage of this method is that we are able to analyze the behaviour of a set of k rounded variables together as opposed to just a pair of rounded variables in most previous methods. In the linear case we prove that a predicate called “Monarchy” is approximable. This predicate is not amenable to our algorithm for the quadratic case, nor to other LP/SDP-based approaches we are aware of.