FreeSpan: frequent pattern-projected sequential pattern mining
Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
SPADE: an efficient algorithm for mining frequent sequences
Machine Learning
Mining Sequential Patterns: Generalizations and Performance Improvements
EDBT '96 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology
ICDE '95 Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering
PrefixSpan: Mining Sequential Patterns by Prefix-Projected Growth
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Data Engineering
Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases
VLDB '94 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases
Sequential PAttern mining using a bitmap representation
Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Multi-resolution bitmap indexes for scientific data
ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS)
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The main challenge of mining sequential patterns is the high processing cost of support counting for large amount of candidate patterns. For solving this problem, SPAM algorithm was proposed in SIGKDD'2002, which utilized a depth-first traversal on the search space combined with a vertical bitmap representation to provide efficient support counting. According to its experimental results, SPAM outperformed the previous works SPADE and PrefixSpan algorithms on large datasets. However, the SPAM algorithm is efficient under the assumption that a huge amount of main memory is available such that its practicability is in question. In this paper, an Improved-version of SPAM algorithm, called I-SPAM, is proposed. By extending the structures of data representation, several heuristic mechanisms are proposed to speed up the efficiency of support counting further. Moreover, the required memory size for storing temporal data during mining process of our method is less than the one needed by SPAM. The experimental results show that I-SPAM can achieve the same magnitude efficiency and even better than SPAM on execution time under about half the maximum memory requirement of SPAM.