Constructing a perfect matching is in random NC
Combinatorica
Matching is as easy as matrix inversion
Combinatorica
The method of forced enumeration for nondeterministic automata
Acta Informatica
Nondeterministic space is closed under complementation
SIAM Journal on Computing
Maximum matchings in general graphs through randomization
Journal of Algorithms
Unique maximum matching algorithms
STOC '99 Proceedings of the thirty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Fast Probabilistic Algorithms for Verification of Polynomial Identities
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
The complexity of matrix rank and feasible systems of linear equations
Computational Complexity
Isolation, matching and counting uniform and nonuniform upper bounds
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
Probabilistic algorithms for sparse polynomials
EUROSAM '79 Proceedings of the International Symposiumon on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation
NC Algorithms for Comparability Graphs, Interval Gaphs, and Testing for Unique Perfect Matching
Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science
The complexity of the characteristic and the minimal polynomial
Theoretical Computer Science - Mathematical foundations of computer science
NC Algorithms for Comparability Graphs, Interval Graphs, and Unique Perfect Matchings
NC Algorithms for Comparability Graphs, Interval Graphs, and Unique Perfect Matchings
Planarity, Determinants, Permanents, and (Unique) Matchings
ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)
The polynomially bounded perfect matching problem is in NC2
STACS'07 Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Theoretical aspects of computer science
Planarizing gadgets for perfect matching do not exist
MFCS'12 Proceedings of the 37th international conference on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science
Planarity, determinants, permanents, and (unique) matchings
CSR'07 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Computer Science: theory and applications
Log-Space Algorithms for Paths and Matchings in k-Trees
Theory of Computing Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this note, we give tighter bounds on the complexity of the bipartite unique perfect matching problem, bipartite-UPM. We show that the problem is in C=L and in NL⊕L, both subclasses of NC2. We also consider the (unary) weighted version of the problem. We show that testing uniqueness of the minimum-weight perfect matching problem for bipartite graphs is in ${\rm \bf L}^{{\rm \bf C_=L}}$ and in NL⊕L. Furthermore, we show that bipartite-UPM is hard for NL.