On the minimal synchronism needed for distributed consensus
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Consensus in the presence of partial synchrony
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Viewstamped Replication: A New Primary Copy Method to Support Highly-Available Distributed Systems
PODC '88 Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM Symposium on Principles of distributed computing
Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
The weakest failure detector for solving consensus
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Failure detectors in omission failure environments
PODC '97 Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS)
Solving Agreement Problems with Weak Ordering Oracles
EDCC-4 Proceedings of the 4th European Dependable Computing Conference on Dependable Computing
Fast Indulgent Consensus with Zero Degradation
EDCC-4 Proceedings of the 4th European Dependable Computing Conference on Dependable Computing
Failure Detection and Consensus in the Crash-Recovery Model
DISC '98 Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Distributed Computing
Another advantage of free choice (Extended Abstract): Completely asynchronous agreement protocols
PODC '83 Proceedings of the second annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
Consensus in Asynchronous Systems Where Processes Can Crash and Recover
SRDS '98 Proceedings of the The 17th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems
Uniform consensus is harder than consensus
Journal of Algorithms
SFCS '83 Proceedings of the 24th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper we introduce two new WAB-based consensus algorithms for the crash-recovery model. The first one, B*-Consensus, is resilient to up to f n/2 permanent faults, and can solve consensus in three communication steps. R*-Consensus, our second algorithm, is f n/3 resilient, and can solve consensus in two communication steps. These algorithms are optimal with respect to the time complexity versus resilience tradeoff. We compare our algorithms to other consensus algorithms in the crash-recovery model.