Properties of measures of information in evidence and possibility theories
Fuzzy Sets and Systems - Special Issue: Measures of Uncertainty
The principle of minimum specificity as a basis for evidential reasoning
Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems on Uncertainty in knowledge-based systems. International Conference on Information
Measuring inconsistency in knowledge via quasi-classical models
Eighteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence
Quasi-possibilistic logic and its measures of information and conflict
Fundamenta Informaticae
A Probabilistic XML Approach to Data Integration
ICDE '05 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering
Merging uncertain information with semantic heterogeneity in XML
Knowledge and Information Systems
Fusion rules for merging uncertain information
Information Fusion
ProTDB: probabilistic data in XML
VLDB '02 Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Very Large Data Bases
Elicitation, assessment, and pooling of expert judgments using possibility theory
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
A knowledge-based approach to merging information
Knowledge-Based Systems
Conflict Analysis and Merging Operators Selection in Possibility Theory
ECSQARU '07 Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Measuring conflict between possibilistic uncertain information through belief function theory
KSEM'06 Proceedings of the First international conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In previous papers, we have presented a framework for merging structured information in XML involving uncertainty in the form of probabilities, degrees of beliefs and necessity measures [HL04,HL05a,HL05b]. In this paper, we focus on the quality of uncertain information before merging. We first provide two definitions for measuring information quality of individually inconsistent possibilistic XML documents, and they complement the commonly used concept of inconsistency degree. These definitions enable us to identify if an XML document is of good or lower quality when it is inconsistent, as well as enable us to differentiate between documents that have the same degree of inconsistency. We then propose a more general method to measure the quality of an inconsistent possibilistic XML document in terms of a pair of coherence measures.