Fine-grained scalable streaming from coarse-grained videos
Proceedings of the 18th international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video
Low overhead container format for adaptive streaming
MMSys '10 Proceedings of the first annual ACM SIGMM conference on Multimedia systems
Subjective impression of variations in layer encoded videos
IWQoS'03 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Quality of service
Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP --: standards and design principles
MMSys '11 Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Multimedia systems
An experimental evaluation of rate-adaptation algorithms in adaptive streaming over HTTP
MMSys '11 Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Multimedia systems
Video streaming using a location-based bandwidth-lookup service for bitrate planning
ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP)
Analysis of a real-world HTTP segment streaming case
Proceedings of the 11th european conference on Interactive TV and video
Commute path bandwidth traces from 3G networks: analysis and applications
Proceedings of the 4th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference
GTube: geo-predictive video streaming over HTTP in mobile environments
Proceedings of the 5th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference
Hi-index | 0.00 |
There are many available commercial streaming solutions that perform quality adaption. An important issue with respect to users' perceived quality is how the system schedules the quality levels to match the available network resources. In this study, we compare several adaptive media players on the market to see how they perform in challenging streaming scenarios on a mobile 3G network. Bandwidth data collected in real-world field trials is used in all tests. We investigate how the media players respond to fluctuating bandwidth and outages, and how this affects the quality levels used, the bandwidth utilization, and the number and duration of buffer underruns. We found significant differences in performance and optimization goals between the different players' schedulers. We conclude that the quality scheduler is an important factor in providing a satisfying quality of experience when using an adaptive media player.