Lessons learned from automated analysis of industrial UML class models (an experience report)

  • Authors:

  • Betty H. C. Cheng;Ryan Stephenson;Brian Berenbach

  • Affiliations:

  • Software Engineering and Network Systems Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan;Software Engineering and Network Systems Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan;Siemens Corporate Research, Inc

  • Venue:
  • MoDELS'05 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems
  • Year:
  • 2005

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Automated analysis of object-oriented design models can provide insight into the quality of a given software design. Data obtained from automated analysis, however, is often too complex to be easily understood by a designer. This paper examines the use of an automated analysis tool on industrial software UML class models, where one set of models was created as part of the design process and the other was obtained from reverse engineering code. The analysis was performed by DesignAdvisor, a tool developed by Siemens Corporate Research, that supports metrics-based analysis and detection of design guideline violations. The paper describes the lessons learned from using the automated analysis techniques to assess the quality of these models. We also assess the impact of design pattern use in the overall quality of the models. Based on our lessons learned, identify design guidelines that would minimize the occurrence of these errors.