A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search
STOC '96 Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing
SIAM Journal on Computing
STOC '01 Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
STOC '01 Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Quantum Walks on the Hypercube
RANDOM '02 Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Randomization and Approximation Techniques
Exponential algorithmic speedup by a quantum walk
Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Quantum Search of Spatial Regions
FOCS '03 Proceedings of the 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Quantum Speed-Up of Markov Chain Based Algorithms
FOCS '04 Proceedings of the 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Coins make quantum walks faster
SODA '05 Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Decoherence in quantum walks – a review
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science
On the hitting times of quantum versus random walks
SODA '09 Proceedings of the twentieth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Quantum walk based search algorithms
TAMC'08 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Theory and applications of models of computation
Finding is as easy as detecting for quantum walks
ICALP'10 Proceedings of the 37th international colloquium conference on Automata, languages and programming
Spatial search on a honeycomb network
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science
Quantum walks: a comprehensive review
Quantum Information Processing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We study the quantum walk search algorithm of Shenvi et al. (Phys Rev A 67:052307, 2003) on data structures of one to two spatial dimensions, on which the algorithm is thought to be less efficient than in three or more spatial dimensions. Our aim is to understand why the quantum algorithm is dimension dependent whereas the best classical algorithm is not, and to show in more detail how the efficiency of the quantum algorithm varies with spatial dimension or accessibility of the data. Our numerical results agree with the expected scaling in 2D of $$O(\sqrt{N \log N})$$ , and show how the prefactors display significant dependence on both the degree and symmetry of the graph. Specifically, we see, as expected, the prefactor of the time complexity dropping as the degree (connectivity) of the structure is increased.