Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, 111
Journal of Computational Physics
Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes
Journal of Computational Physics
Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes
Journal of Computational Physics
Journal of Computational Physics
A technique of treating negative weights in WENO schemes
Journal of Computational Physics
Journal of Computational Physics
A Weighted Essentially Nonoscillatory, Large Time-Step Scheme for Hamilton--Jacobi Equations
SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
Journal of Computational Physics
Approximation error of the Lagrange reconstructing polynomial
Journal of Approximation Theory
Hi-index | 7.29 |
The Lagrange reconstructing polynomial [C.W. Shu, High-order WENO schemes for convection-dominated problems, SIAM Rev. 51 (1) (2009) 82-126] of a function f(x) on a given set of equidistant (@Dx=const) points {x"i+@?@Dx;@?@?{-M"-,...,+M"+}} is defined as the polynomial whose sliding (with x) averages on [x-12@Dx,x+12@Dx] are equal to the Lagrange interpolating polynomial of f(x) on the same stencil [G.A. Gerolymos, Approximation error of the Lagrange reconstructing polynomial, J. Approx. Theory 163 (2) (2011) 267-305. doi:10.1016/j.jat.2010.09.007]. We first study the fundamental functions of Lagrange reconstruction, then show that these polynomials have only real and distinct roots, which are never located at the cell-interfaces (half-points) x"i+n12@Dx (n@?Z), and obtain several identities. Using these identities, we show that there exists a unique representation of the Lagrange reconstructing polynomial on {i-M"-,...,i+M"+} as a combination of the Lagrange reconstructing polynomials on Neville substencils [E. Carlini, R. Ferretti, G. Russo, A WENO large time-step scheme for Hamilton-Jacobi equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 27 (3) (2005) 1071-1091], with weights which are rational functions of @x (x=x"i+@x@Dx) [Y.Y. Liu, C.W. Shu, M.P. Zhang, On the positivity of the linear weights in WENO approximations, Acta Math. Appl. Sin. 25 (3) (2009) 503-538], and give an analytical recursive expression of the weight-functions. We show that all of the poles of the rational weight-functions are real, and that there can be no poles at half-points. We then use the analytical expression of the weight-functions, combined with the factorization of the fundamental functions of Lagrange reconstruction, to obtain a formal proof of convexity (positivity of the weight-functions) in the neighborhood of @x=12, iff all of the substencils contain either point i or point i+1 (or both).