A case for end system multicast (keynote address)
Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
Scalable application layer multicast
Proceedings of the 2002 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
Resilience in Overlay Multicast Protocols
MASCOTS '06 Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation
Understanding churn in peer-to-peer networks
Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement
ATEC '04 Proceedings of the annual conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference
Deployment issues for the IP multicast service and architecture
IEEE Network: The Magazine of Global Internetworking
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The presentation of a landmark paper by Chu et al. at SIGMETRICS 2000 introduced application layer multicast (ALM) as completely new area of network research. Many researchers have since proposed ALM protocols, and have shown that these protocols only put a small burden on the network in terms of link-stress and -stretch. However, since the network is typically not a bottleneck, user acceptance remains the limiting factor for the deployment of ALM. In this paper we present an in-depth study of the user-perceived performance of the NICE ALM protocol. We use the OverSim simulation framework to evaluate delay experienced by a user and bandwidth consumption on the user’s access link in large multicast groups and under aggressive churn models. Our major results are (1) latencies grow moderate with increasing number of nodes as clusters get optimized, (2) join delays get optimized over time, and (3) despite being a tree-dissemination protocol NICE handles churn surprisingly well when adjusting heartbeat intervals accordingly. We conclude that NICE comes up to the user’s expectations even for large groups and under high churn.