Software inspections, reviews & walkthroughs
Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering
ISESE '04 Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering
An eye-tracking methodology for characterizing program comprehension processes
Proceedings of the 2006 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications
Analyzing individual performance of source code review using reviewers' eye movement
Proceedings of the 2006 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications
Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications
Temporal eye-tracking data: evolution of debugging strategies with multiple representations
Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications
DRESREM 2: An Analysis System for Multi-document Software Review Using Reviewers' Eye Movements
ICSEA '08 Proceedings of the 2008 The Third International Conference on Software Engineering Advances
Integrating pedagogical code reviews into a CS 1 course: an empirical study
Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
An Eye Tracking Study on camelCase and under_score Identifier Styles
ICPC '10 Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 18th International Conference on Program Comprehension
Hi-index | 0.00 |
An eye-tracking study is presented that investigates how individuals find defects in source code. This work partially replicates a previous eye-tracking study by Uwano et al. [2006]. In the Uwano study, eye movements are used to characterize the performance of individuals in reviewing source code. Their analysis showed that subjects who did not spend enough time initially scanning the code tend to take more time finding defects. The study here follows a similar setup with added eye-tracking measures and analyses on effectiveness and efficiency of finding defects with respect to eye gaze. The subject pool is larger and is comprised of a varied skill level. Results indicate that scanning significantly correlates with defect detection time as well as visual effort on relevant defect lines. Results of the study are compared and contrasted to the Uwano study.