Types and persistence in database programming languages
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Representing database programs as objects
Advances in database programming languages
HOPL-II The second ACM SIGPLAN conference on History of programming languages
Abstract types have existential types
POPL '85 Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages
Types and programming languages
Types and programming languages
Ownership types for object encapsulation
POPL '03 Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages
Synthesizing Object-Oriented and Functional Design to Promote Re-Use
ECCOP '98 Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming
Simple Ownership Types for Object Containment
ECOOP '01 Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming
Concurrency - The Fly in the Ointment?
Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Persistent Object Systems (POS8) and Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Persistence and Java (PJW3): Advances in Persistent Object Systems
Object-Oriented Programming Versus Abstract Data Types
Proceedings of the REX School/Workshop on Foundations of Object-Oriented Languages
LFP '84 Proceedings of the 1984 ACM Symposium on LISP and functional programming
Lightweight confinement for featherweight java
OOPSLA '03 Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programing, systems, languages, and applications
Communications of the ACM - Voting systems
Object-oriented encapsulation for dynamically typed languages
OOPSLA '04 Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications
Ownership confinement ensures representation independence for object-oriented programs
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
A unified approach to modeling and programming
MODELS'10 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Model driven engineering languages and systems: Part I
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
I was aware of a need for object-oriented programming long before I learned that it existed. I felt the need because I was using C and Lisp to build medium-sized systems, including a widely-used text editor, CASE and VLSI tools. Stated simply, I wanted flexible connections between providers and consumers of behavior in my systems. For example, in the text editor anything could produce text (files, in-memory buffers, selections, output of formatters, etc) and be connected to any consumer of text. Object-oriented programming solved this problem, and many others; it also provided a clearer way to think about the problems. For me, this thinking was very pragmatic: object solved practical programming problems cleanly.