Analysis of a compound bin packing algorithm
SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics
The parametric behavior of the first-fit decreasing bin packing algorithm
Journal of Algorithms
Improved space for bounded-space, on-line bin-packing
SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics
Better approximation algorithms for bin covering
SODA '01 Proceedings of the twelfth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Windows scheduling as a restricted version of Bin Packing
SODA '04 Proceedings of the fifteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
On lazy bin covering and packing problems
COCOON'06 Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on Computing and Combinatorics
The maximum resource bin packing problem
FCT'05 Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Fundamentals of Computation Theory
Asymptotic fully polynomial approximation schemes for variants of open-end bin packing
Information Processing Letters
Hardness of lazy packing and covering
Operations Research Letters
The lazy bureaucrat problem with common arrivals and deadlines: approximation and mechanism design
FCT'13 Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Fundamentals of Computation Theory
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we study two variants of the bin packing /covering problems called Maximum Resource Bin Packing (MRBP) and Lazy Bin Covering (LBC) problems, and present new approximation algorithms for each of them. For the offline MRBP problem, the previous best known approximation ratio is $\frac{6}{5}=1.2$, achieved by the classical First-Fit-Increasing (FFI) algorithm [1]. In this paper, we give a new FFI-type algorithm with an approximation ratio of $\frac{80}{71}\approx 1.12676$. For the offline LBC problem, it has been shown in [2] that the classical First-Fit-Decreasing (FFD) algorithm achieves an approximation ratio of $\frac{71}{60}\approx 1.18333$. In this paper, we present a new FFD-type algorithm with an approximation ratio of $\frac{17}{15}\approx 1.13333$. Both algorithms are simple, run in near linear time (i.e., O(n logn)), and therefore are practical.