An incremental method for generating prime implicants/implicates
Journal of Symbolic Computation
Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (Vol. 4)
On the logic of iterated belief revision
Artificial Intelligence
Computing Prime Implicates Incrementally
CADE-11 Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automated Deduction: Automated Deduction
Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment
TARK '88 Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Iterated theory base change: a computational model
IJCAI'95 Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
Found ations of assumption-based truth maintenance systems: preliminary report
AAAI'87 Proceedings of the sixth National conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Prime implicates and prime implicants: from propositional to modal logic
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Implementing iterated belief change via prime implicates
AI'07 Proceedings of the 20th Australian joint conference on Advances in artificial intelligence
Prime forms and minimal change in propositional belief bases
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Knowledge-Base revision using implications as hypotheses
KI'12 Proceedings of the 35th Annual German conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Techniques for knowledge compilation like prime implicates and binary decision diagrams (BDDs) are effective methods for improving the practical efficiency of reasoning tasks. In this paper we provide a construction for a belief contraction operator using prime implicates. We also briefly indicate how this technique can be used for belief expansion, belief revision and also iterated belief change. This simple yet novel technique has two significant features: (a) the contraction operator constructed satisfies all the AGM postulates for belief contraction; (b) when compilation has been effected only syntactic manipulation is required in order to contract the reasoner's belief state.