Progress in Automatic Signature Verification
Progress in Automatic Signature Verification
Machine Learning
Off-line Signature Verification Using HMM for Random, Simple and Skilled Forgeries
ICDAR '01 Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition
A generalized kernel approach to dissimilarity-based classification
The Journal of Machine Learning Research
Incremental construction of classifier and discriminant ensembles
Information Sciences: an International Journal
International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition
Similarity-based classification of sequences using hidden Markov models
Pattern Recognition
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST)
Dynamic ensemble selection for off-line signature verification
MCS'11 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Multiple classifier systems
A Multi-Classifier System for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
ASONAM '12 Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2012)
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Although widely used to reduce error rates of difficult pattern recognition problems, multiple classifier systems are not in widespread use in off-line signature verification. In this paper, a two-stage off-line signature verification system based on dissimilarity representation is proposed. In the first stage, a set of discrete HMMs trained with different number of states and/or different codebook sizes is used to calculate similarity measures that populate new feature vectors. In the second stage, these vectors are employed to train a SVM (or an ensemble of SVMs) that provides the final classification. Experiments performed by using a real-world signature verification database (with random, simple and skilled forgeries) indicate that the proposed system can significantly reduce the overall error rates, when compared to a traditional feature-based system using HMMs. Moreover, the use of ensemble of SVMs in the second stage can reduce individual error rates in up to 10%.