Issues in analyzing telugu sentences towards building a telugu treebank

Authors:
Chaitanya Vempaty;Viswanatha Naidu;Samar Husain;Ravi Kiran;Lakshmi Bai;Dipti M Sharma;Rajeev Sangal
Affiliations:
Language Technologies Research Centre, IIIT, Hyderabad, India;Language Technologies Research Centre, IIIT, Hyderabad, India;Language Technologies Research Centre, IIIT, Hyderabad, India;Language Technologies Research Centre, IIIT, Hyderabad, India;Language Technologies Research Centre, IIIT, Hyderabad, India;Language Technologies Research Centre, IIIT, Hyderabad, India;Language Technologies Research Centre, IIIT, Hyderabad, India
Venue:
CICLing'10 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing
Year:
2010

Citing 4
Cited 1

Evaluation of Tectogrammatical Annotation of PDT

TDS '00 Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Text, Speech and Dialogue
Building a large annotated corpus of English: the penn treebank

Computational Linguistics - Special issue on using large corpora: II
A Karaka Based Annotation Scheme for English

CICLing '09 Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing
A multi-representational and multi-layered treebank for Hindi/Urdu

ACL-IJCNLP '09 Proceedings of the Third Linguistic Annotation Workshop

Tamil dependency parsing: results using rule based and corpus based approaches

CICLing'11 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing - Volume Part I

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper describes an effort towards building a Telugu Dependency Treebank. We discuss the basic framework and issues we encountered while annotating. 1487 sentences have been annotated in Paninian framework. We also discuss how some of the annotation decisions would effect the development of a parser for Telugu.