Argumentation schemes for collaborative planning

Authors:
Alice Toniolo;Timothy J. Norman;Katia Sycara
Affiliations:
Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK;Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK;Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Venue:
PRIMA'11 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Agents in Principle, Agents in Practice
Year:
2011

Citing 7
Cited 3

Knowlege in action: logical foundations for specifying and implementing dynamical systems

Knowlege in action: logical foundations for specifying and implementing dynamical systems
An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning

AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning

AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue: Research Articles

International Journal of Intelligent Systems - Computational Models of Natural Argumentation
Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems

Artificial Intelligence
The chisholm paradox and the situation calculus

ISMIS'05 Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Foundations of Intelligent Systems
A generative dialogue system for arguing about plans in situation calculus

ArgMAS'09 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems

On the benefits of argumentation schemes in deliberative dialogue

Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3
Context-Aware Multi-Agent Planning in intelligent environments

Information Sciences: an International Journal
Opponent models with uncertainty for strategic argumentation

IJCAI'13 Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We address the collaborative planning problem among agents where they have different objectives and norms. In this context, agreeing on the best course of action to adopt represents a significant challenge. Concurrent actions and causal plan-constraints may lead to conflicts of opinion on what to do. Moreover, individual norms can constrain agent behaviour. We propose an argumentation-based model for deliberative dialogues based on argumentation schemes. This model facilitates agreements about joint plans by enriching the quality of the dialogue through the exchange of relevant information about plan commitments and norms.