Characterization of argumentation semantics in terms of the MMr semantics

Authors:
Mauricio Osorio;José Luis Carballido;Claudia Zepeda;Zenaida Cruz
Affiliations:
CENTIA, Universidad de las Américas, Cholula, Puebla, México;Facultad de Ciencias de la Computación, Benemérita Universidad Atónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Puebla, México;CENTIA, Universidad de las Américas, Cholula, Puebla, México;Facultad de Ciencias de la Computación, Benemérita Universidad Atónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Puebla, México
Venue:
MICAI'11 Proceedings of the 10th Mexican international conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence - Volume Part I
Year:
2011

Citing 8
Cited 0

The well-founded semantics for general logic programs

Journal of the ACM (JACM)
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation in artificial intelligence

Artificial Intelligence
On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics

Artificial Intelligence
Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics

International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Semi-Stable Semantics

Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics

Artificial Intelligence
A Schema for Generating Relevant Logic Programming Semantics and its Applications in Argumentation Theory

Fundamenta Informaticae - Logic, Language, Information and Computation

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Argumentation theory studies the fundamental mechanism humans use in argumentation and explores ways to implement this mechanism on computers. Dung's approach, presented in [9], is a unifying framework which has played an influential role on argumentation research. In this paper, we show that, a logic programming semantics, called MMr, can be used to characterize the preferred argumentation semantics defined by Dung in [9]. The MMr [12] is based on the the minimal model semantics. The characterization of this argumentation semantics by the MMr semantics suggests a new perception of this argumentation semantics in terms of logic foundations.