Reasoning about consistency with spatial mental models: hidden and obvious indeterminacy in spatial descriptions

  • Authors:
  • Georg Jahn;P. N. Johnson-Laird;Markus Knauff

  • Affiliations:
  • Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany;Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ;Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

  • Venue:
  • SC'04 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Spatial Cognition: reasoning, Action, Interaction
  • Year:
  • 2004

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The assessment of whether a statement is consistent with what has gone before is ubiquitous in discourse comprehension. One theory of the process is that individuals search for a mental model of a situation in which all the statements in the discourse are true. In the case of spatial descriptions, individuals should prefer to construct models, which retain the information in the description. Hence, they should use strategies that retain information in an efficient way. If the descriptions are consistent with multiple models then they are likely to run into difficulties. We report some preliminary results of experiments in which the participants judged the consistency of spatial descriptions. The participants made more errors when later assertions in the description conflicted with the preferred models of earlier assertions.