Evaluating score and publication similarity functions in digital libraries

Authors:
S. Bani-Ahmad;A. Cakmak;A. Al-Hamdani;Gultekin Ozsoyoglu
Affiliations:
Case Western Reserve Univ;Case Western Reserve Univ;Dept. of Computer Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman;Case Western Reserve Univ
Venue:
ICADL'05 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Asian Digital Libraries: implementing strategies and sharing experiences
Year:
2005

Citing 2
Cited 1

Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment

Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Querying web metadata: Native score management and text support in databases

ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS)

Improved publication scores for online digital libraries via research pyramids

ECDL'07 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Digital libraries do not assign importance/relevance scores to their publications, authors, or publication venues, even though scores are potentially useful for (a) providing comparative assessment, or “importances”, of publications, authors, publication venues, (b) ranking publications returned in search outputs, and (c) using scores in locating similar publications. Using social networks and bibliometrics, one can define several score functions.