A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming
Combinatorica
Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
Complexity of determining nonemptiness of the core
Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Electronic commerce
Convex Optimization
NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: a survey
Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking
Fair Coalitions for Power-Aware Routing in Wireless Networks
IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
Internet economics: the use of Shapley value for ISP settlement
CoNEXT '07 Proceedings of the 2007 ACM CoNEXT conference
IEEE Transactions on Communications
On the core of the multicommodity flow game
Decision Support Systems - Special issue: The fourth ACM conference on electronic commerce
Incentivizing peer-assisted services: a fluid shapley value approach
Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
Wireless Networking
Low-complexity video coding for receiver-driven layered multicast
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Coalitions in Cooperative Wireless Networks
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Inefficient Noncooperation in Networking Games of Common-Pool Resources
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Provider-customer coalitional games
GameNets'09 Proceedings of the First ICST international conference on Game Theory for Networks
Adapp: an adaptive network selection framework for smartphone applications
Proceeding of the 2013 workshop on Cellular networks: operations, challenges, and future design
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We consider a network in which several service providers offer wireless access to their respective subscribed customers through potentially multihop routes. If providers cooperate by jointly deploying and pooling their resources, such as spectrum and infrastructure (e.g., base stations) and agree to serve each others' customers, their aggregate payoffs, and individual shares, may substantially increase through opportunistic utilization of resources. The potential of such cooperation can, however, be realized only if each provider intelligently determines with whom it would cooperate, when it would cooperate, and how it would deploy and share its resources during such cooperation. Also, developing a rational basis for sharing the aggregate payoffs is imperative for the stability of the coalitions. We model such cooperation using the theory of transferable payoff coalitional games. We show that the optimum cooperation strategy, which involves the acquisition, deployment, and allocation of the channels and base stations (to customers), can be computed as the solution of a concave or an integer optimization. We next show that the grand coalition is stable in many different settings, i.e., if all providers cooperate, there is always an operating point that maximizes the providers' aggregate payoff, while offering each a share that removes any incentive to split from the coalition. The optimal cooperation strategy and the stabilizing payoff shares can be obtained in polynomial time by respectively solving the primals and the duals of the above optimizations, using distributed computations and limited exchange of confidential information among the providers. Numerical evaluations reveal that cooperation substantially enhances individual providers' payoffs under the optimal cooperation strategy and several different payoff sharing rules.