Object serialization analysis and comparison in Java and .NET
ACM SIGPLAN Notices
Benefits of alternate XML serialization formats in scientific computing
Proceedings of the 2007 workshop on Service-oriented computing performance: aspects, issues, and approaches
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
Utilizing intelligent middleware for reconfiguration of applications on android
ICHIT'11 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Convergence and hybrid information technology
A multi-modal communication approach to describing the surroundings to mobile users
W2GIS'13 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems
Proposta de modelo de representação de informações para navegadores de realidade aumentada
Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Because of the increase in easily obtainable internet-connected mobile devices and their unique characteristics, choosing the proper data serialization format has become increasingly difficult. These devices are resource scarce and bandwidth limited. In this paper, we compare four different data serialization formats with an emphasis on serialization speed, data size, and usability. The selected serialization formats include XML, JSON, Thrift, and ProtoBuf. XML and JSON are the most well known text-based data formats, while ProtoBuf and Thrift are relatively new binary serialization formats. These data serialization formats are tested on an Android device using both text-heavy and number-heavy objects.