Receiver-driven layered multicast
Conference proceedings on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
Adaptive bitstream switching of scalable video
Image Communication
Capacity gain of mixed multicast/unicast transport schemes in a TV distribution network
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
Dimensioning of a multi-rate network transporting variable bit rate TV channels
ICC'09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international conference on Communications
A framework for video streaming to resource-constrained terminals
EUC'05 Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing
Context-based adaptive binary arithmetic coding in the H.264/AVC video compression standard
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Video broadcast operators target a variety of receiving devices of different resolutions and processing capabilities. In such a heterogeneous TV network, the transport resource consumption is likely to increase. In this paper we estimate the required transport capacity for a broadcast TV network taking into account parameters as currently proposed in standardization bodies. We target constant video quality, hence the TV channel has variable bit rate (VBR). We consider a multicast-based transport system where only the required versions of a TV channel are transported; this leads to fluctuation of the consumed transport capacity over time. The main focus in this paper is on the comparison of a simulcast and a scalable video coding (SVC) transport scheme in several realistic examples with different encoding modes, including spatial and/or quality scalability. To estimate the required transport capacity for simulcast and SVC, we use a comprehensive toolkit based on a Gaussian approximation of the capacity demand. In order to obtain realistic input values for our calculation tools, we characterize the fluctuations of the bit rate associated with a TV channel by encoding a representative set of video clips. Based on the considered realistic examples, we explore under what conditions either the simulcast or the SVC transport scheme is more efficient.