Multisensor Decision and Estimation Fusion
Multisensor Decision and Estimation Fusion
Estimation and decision fusion: A survey
Neurocomputing
Evidence supporting measure of similarity for reducing the complexity in information fusion
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Tabu search based multi-watermarks embedding algorithm with multiple description coding
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Channel aware decision fusion in wireless sensor networks
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Fusion of decisions transmitted over Rayleigh fading channels in wireless sensor networks
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Decentralized detection in sensor networks
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Fusion of censored decisions in wireless sensor networks
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
Unified fusion rules for multisensor multihypothesis network decision systems
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans
Distributed detection for diversity reception of fading signals in noise
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Asymptotic results for decentralized detection in power constrained wireless sensor networks
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
A variational Bayesian approach to robust sensor fusion based on Student-t distribution
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Hi-index | 0.07 |
In a wireless sensor network, a fusion center may receive incorrect information from local sensors, with some probabilities of transmission errors, due to channel fading. To cope with such a problem, we generalize the likelihood-ratio-test method of Chen and Willett (2005) [7] and derive optimal local sensor compression rules that minimize the Bayesian cost under a given fusion rule and transmission error probabilities. Our proposed method is able to operate without conditional independence between sensor data, which is often required by existing methods. Numerical examples are also used to validate the performance through receiver operating characteristics curves. These examples highlight the interesting features of our method compared to those in ideal situations.