Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web
Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches
ACM SIGMOD Record
ACM SIGMOD Record
Ontology Matching
COMA: a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches
VLDB '02 Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Very Large Data Bases
Integrating Dublin Core metadata for cultural heritage collections using ontologies
DCMI '07 Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: application profiles: theory and practice
Evaluating ontology mapping techniques: An experiment in public safety information sharing
Decision Support Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Existing ontology mapping tools differ in terms of the task for which the mapping tools are designed. As a result, direct comparison is difficult to conduct due to the disparate nature of the tools. In this paper, a benchmark case of manual mapping is used to compare the mapping results between selected mapping tools. The benchmark is set up which is based on the manual mapping between Revised Traditional Malay Textile (TMT) Knowledge Model and CIDOC CRM. For comparison, similar mappings are conducted using selected mapping tools based on the categories defined. Based on the finding, an evaluation framework on the quality of mapping is proposed which mainly focuses on three design criteria which are efficiency, effectiveness and efficacy. In future, this work will help to determine the best practice in ontology construction through mapping by considering both manual and automation approach.