Minimax option pricing meets black-scholes in the limit

  • Authors:
  • Jacob Abernethy;Rafael M. Frongillo;Andre Wibisono

  • Affiliations:
  • University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA;University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA;University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA

  • Venue:
  • STOC '12 Proceedings of the forty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Option contracts are a type of financial derivative that allow investors to hedge risk and speculate on the variation of an asset's future market price. In short, an option has a particular payout that is based on the market price for an asset on a given date in the future. In 1973, Black and Scholes proposed a valuation model for options that essentially estimates the tail risk of the asset price under the assumption that the price will fluctuate according to geometric Brownian motion. A key element of their analysis is that the investor can "hedge" the payout of the option by continuously buying and selling the asset depending on the price fluctuations. More recently, DeMarzo et al. proposed a more robust valuation scheme which does not require any assumption on the price path; indeed, in their model the asset's price can even be chosen adversarially. This framework can be considered as a sequential two-player zero-sum game between the investor and Nature. We analyze the value of this game in the limit, where the investor can trade at smaller and smaller time intervals. Under weak assumptions on the actions of Nature (an adversary), we show that the minimax option price asymptotically approaches exactly the Black-Scholes valuation. The key piece of our analysis is showing that Nature's minimax optimal dual strategy converges to geometric Brownian motion in the limit.