Editorial: Quality of hierarchies in ontologies and folksonomies

  • Authors:

  • Geir Solskinnsbakk;Jon Atle Gulla;Veronika Haderlein;Per Myrseth;Olga Cerrato

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway;Department of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway;Det Norske Veritas (DNV), Oslo, Norway;Det Norske Veritas (DNV), Oslo, Norway;Det Norske Veritas (DNV), Oslo, Norway

  • Venue:
  • Data & Knowledge Engineering
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Ontologies have been a hot research topic for the recent decade and have been used for many applications such as information integration, semantic search, knowledge management, etc. Manual engineering of ontologies is a costly process and automatic ontology engineering lacks in precision. Folksonomies have recently emerged as another hot research topic and several research efforts have been made to extract (lightweight) ontologies automatically from folksonomy data. Due to the high cost of manual ontology engineering and the lack of precision in automatic ontology engineering it is important that we are able to evaluate the structure of the ontology. Detection of problems with the suggested ontology at an early stage can, especially for manually engineered ontologies, be cost saving. In this paper we present an approach to evaluate the quality of hierarchical relations in ontologies and folksonomy based structures. The approach is based on constructing shallow semantic representations of the ontology concepts and folksonomy tags. We specify four hypotheses regarding the semantic representations and different quality aspects of the hierarchical relations and perform an evaluation on two different data sets. The results of the evaluation confirm our hypotheses.