An empirical comparison of nine pattern classifiers

Authors:
Q. -L. Tran;K. -A. Toh;D. Srinivasan;K. -L. Wong;Shaun Qiu-Cen Low
Affiliations:
Inst. for Infocomm Res., Singapore, Singapore;-;-;-;-
Venue:
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics
Year:
2005

Citing 0
Cited 6

Performance evaluation of soft color texture descriptors for surface grading using experimental design and logistic regression

Pattern Recognition
Performance evaluation of soft color texture descriptors for surface grading using experimental design and logistic regression

Pattern Recognition
Alpha-Beta Weightless Neural Networks

CIARP '08 Proceedings of the 13th Iberoamerican congress on Pattern Recognition: Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis and Applications
Online sequential fuzzy extreme learning machine for function approximation and classification problems

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics - Special issue on cybernetics and cognitive informatics
Comparing ensembles of learners: detecting prostate cancer from high resolution MRI

CVAMIA'06 Proceedings of the Second ECCV international conference on Computer Vision Approaches to Medical Image Analysis
Resampling methods for quality assessment of classifier performance and optimal number of features

Signal Processing

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

There are many learning algorithms available in the field of pattern classification and people are still discovering new algorithms that they hope will work better. Any new learning algorithm, beside its theoretical foundation, needs to be justified in many aspects including accuracy and efficiency when applied to real life problems. In this paper, we report the empirical comparison of a recent algorithm RM, its new extensions and three classical classifiers in different aspects including classification accuracy, computational time and storage requirement. The comparison is performed in a standardized way and we believe that this would give a good insight into the algorithm RM and its extension. The experiments also show that nominal attributes do have an impact on the performance of those compared learning algorithms.