Decision making of negotiation agents using markov chains
Multiagent and Grid Systems - Negotiation and Scheduling Mechanisms for Multiagent Systems
Agent-based bilateral multi-issue negotiation scheme for e-market transactions
Applied Soft Computing
Agent based e-commerce systems that react to buyers' feedbacks -- A fuzzy approach
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Strategic agents for multi-resource negotiation
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
A Fuzzy Logic System for Bargaining in Information Markets
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST)
Negotiation strategy for mobile agent-based e-negotiation
PRIMA'10 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems
Tasks for agent-based negotiation teams: Analysis, review, and challenges
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
On the use of particle swarm optimization and Kernel density estimator in concurrent negotiations
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Hi-index | 0.00 |
While there are several existing mechanisms and systems addressing the crucial and difficult issues of automated one-to-many negotiation, this paper develops a flexible one-to-many negotiation mechanism for software agents. Unlike the existing general one-to-many negotiation mechanism, in which an agent should wait until it has received proposals from all its trading partners before generating counterproposals, in the flexible one-to-many negotiation mechanism, an agent can make a proposal in a flexible way during negotiation, i.e., negotiation is conducted in continuous time. To decide when to make a proposal, two strategies based on fixed waiting time and a fixed waiting ratio is proposed. Results from a series of experiments suggest that, guided by the two strategies for deciding when to make a proposal, the flexible negotiation mechanism achieved more favorable trading outcomes as compared with the general one-to-many negotiation mechanism. To determine the amount of concession, negotiation agents are guided by four mathematical functions based on factors such as time, trading partners' strategies, negotiation situations of other threads, and competition. Experimental results show that agents guided by the four functions react to changing market situations by making prudent and appropriate rates of concession and achieve generally favorable negotiation outcomes