Comparison of tree-based methods for prognostic stratification of survival data

Authors:
M. Radespiel-Tröger;T. Rabenstein;H. T. Schneider;B. Lausen
Affiliations:
Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Waldstrasse 6, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany;Department of Medicine I, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Krankenhausstrasse 12, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany;Department of Medicine I, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Krankenhausstrasse 12, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany;Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Waldstrasse 6, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
Venue:
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Year:
2003

Citing 3
Cited 3

Stratification by stepwise regression, correspondence analysis and recursive partition: A comparison of three methods of analysis for survival data with covaria

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
Evaluating the effect of optimized cutoff values in the assessment of prognostic factors

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Survival prediction using gene expression data: A review and comparison

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
Interactive survival analysis with the OCDM system: From development to application

Information Systems Frontiers
Classification of infectious diseases based on chemiluminescent signatures of phagocytes in whole blood

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Tree-based methods can be used to generate rules for prognostic classification of patients that are expressed as logical combinations of covariate values. Several splitting algorithms have been proposed for generating trees from survival data. However, the choice of an appropriate algorithm is difficult and may also depend on clinical considerations. By means of a prognostic study of patients with gallbladder stones and of a simulation study, we compare the following splitting algorithms: log-rank statistic adjusted for measurement scale with (AP) and without (AU) pruning, exponential log-likelihood loss (EP), Kaplan-Meier (KP) distance of survival curves, unadjusted log-rank statistic (LP), martingale residuals (MP), and node impurity (ZP). With the exception of the AU algorithm (based on a Bonferroni-adjusted p-value driven stopping rule), trees are pruned using the measure of split-complexity, and optimally-sized trees are selected using cross-validation. The integrated Brier score is used for the evaluation of predictive models. According to the results of our simulation study and of the clinical example, we conclude that the AU, AP, EP, and LP algorithm may yield superior predictive accuracy. The choice among these four algorithms may be based on the required parsimonity and on medical considerations.