Evaluation of two different models of semi-automatic knowledge acquisition for the medical consultant system CADIAG-II/RHEUMA

  • Authors:

  • Harald Leitich;Klaus-Peter Adlassnig;Gernot Kolarz

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Medical Computer Sciences, Section of Medical Expert and Knowledge-Based Systems, University of Vienna Medical School, Spitalgasse 23, A-1090 Vienna, Austria and Department of Obstet ...;Department of Medical Computer Sciences, Section of Medical Expert and Knowledge-Based Systems, University of Vienna Medical School, Spitalgasse 23, A-1090 Vienna, Austria and Department of Obstet ...;Clinic for Rheumatic Disease of the Social Insurance Company for Trade and Industry, Adolfine Malchergasse 1, A-2500 Baden, Austria and Institute for Rheumatology, Marchetstraíe 78, A-2500 Ba ...

  • Venue:
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • Year:
  • 2002

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

As part of a plan to promote semi-automatic knowledge acquisition for the medical consultant system CADIAG-II/RHEUMA, this study sought to explore and cope with the variability of results that may be anticipated when performing knowledge acquisition with patient data from different patient settings. Patient data were drawn both from a published study for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and from a large database of rheumatological patient charts developed for the CADIAG-II/RHEUMA system. An analysis of the relationships between RA and selected CADIAG-II/RHEUMA symptoms was done using two models. In one of them, we controlled for the differences in baseline frequencies of symptoms and diseases in the two study populations as an important factor influencing the results of the calculations. Other factors that were identified included inconsistent definitions of symptoms and diseases, and the different composition of study groups in the two study populations. By eliminating differences in baseline frequencies as the most important bias, the results obtained from the two different knowledge sources became more consistent. All remaining inconsistencies and uncertainties about the contribution and relative importance of the factors were formalized using fuzzy intervals.